![]() ![]() Point be: how to face characters like that of Norton's (and all it depicts, e.g., party system, rigidity, but ultimately, corruption) from the personal sphere of action, and impose a real "changing tread"? On the other hand, a non-organized action (or notion) could not have noticeable influence on the state of affairs, being disperse and accidental. No organized movement could be an alternative to any other organized movement, being only the next step of social evolution. The whole idea of organized movement, though in itself commendable, inherently accounts for the enforcement of status quo, rather than its dissolution, or (on a broader scope) reform of social reality. Solid conception, good to great production though not consistent all the way down to the end, certainly a must watch -better if thought about.Ī specious review will only be redundant, nonetheless, I do have a point, a doubt to be more precise. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |